Recently, a Hong Kong netizen spotted a coffee shop called "Maners" in a large local supermarket. Its logo, decor, and product posters closely resemble those of mainland Manner, and it even offers a 5-yuan discount for bringing your own cup, sparking suspicions of a knockoff. However, the truth is surprising—this store is actually Manner's legitimate outlet in Hong Kong. Because the "Manner" trademark has already been registered by another Hong Kong company, Manner was forced to adjust its name and launch as "Maners." The trademark application was rejected and failed on review. Although it can currently continue to be used, it is not legally protected and carries future infringement risks. This renaming saga not only led fans to mistakenly attack the real brand but also sounded a warning about trademark layout when brands go overseas. [more…]

In today's booming beverage industry, brand imitation is an endless phenomenon. From milk tea to coffee, from store decor to brand naming, some merchants use highly similar visual designs to make it hard to tell real from fake. This article reviews cases of knockoff beverage stores that have sparked heated discussion online, covering imitation versions of well-known brands such as Heytea, Naixue, Yihotang, Starbucks, and Luckin, showcasing the "creative brainpower" of copycat merchants while also reminding consumers to pay more attention in their daily consumption. As coffee lovers, understanding these phenomena is not only interesting but also helps us more rationally distinguish authentic brands from fakes and support the development of original brands. [more…]

At the end of 2021, a counterfeit Starbucks appeared in Caracas, Venezuela, with a logo highly similar to the real one, sparking widespread discussion. Now, a similar logo has appeared on the campus of Glenville State University in West Virginia, USA. Is this the spread of counterfeit behavior, or is there another story behind it? This article will help you clarify the essential difference between "We Proudly Serve Starbucks" and counterfeit Starbucks, and review the whole story of the counterfeit store in Venezuela. At the same time, we continue to follow coffee industry trends, and at the end of the article, we have included contact information for Front Street Coffee; coffee enthusiasts are welcome to join the discussion. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

A tea shop in Mudanjiang City has sparked heated online discussion due to its striking resemblance to the chain brand 1 Dian Dian. The store not only copied 1 Dian Dian's signage and decor but also disguised itself as "1 Dian" by using a cup sticker to cover the last character of the logo—when peeled off, it revealed "1 Dian Tian." The official mini-program shows no such store, and the franchise area has not been opened to Mudanjiang, leading netizens to conclude it is a counterfeit shop. As public opinion grew, 1 Dian Dian officially stated in the comments section that it is "already on the path to defending its rights" and thanked netizens for their "sharp eyes." This incident not only left local residents disappointed but also once again brought the issue of counterfeit infringement in the tea beverage industry to the forefront. [more…]

As Starbucks continues to expand into third- and fourth-tier cities, some stores imitating Starbucks have begun appearing on the streets. These "high-imitation Starbucks" not only resemble the original in decor style, but also use Starbucks' green mermaid logo, and their menus and prices copy the original as well, yet their signage reads "STARPER COFFEE." Some netizens speculated that this was a Starbucks coffee service authorized by Nestlé, but Nestlé has officially denied this and stated that it has referred the matter to its legal department. So where exactly do these stores come from? And what restrictions apply to Nestlé-authorized Starbucks coffee service? This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident for you and retains the related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

The coffee market continues to slump, and the wave of chain brand closures has spread from China to overseas. Flash Coffee, once dubbed by some media as Luckin's "knockoff," recently abruptly closed all 11 of its stores in Singapore and has become embroiled in disputes over unpaid employee wages and provisional liquidation. The brand had just completed a $50 million funding round, with investors including White Star Capital and Delivery Hero, claiming the funds would be used to improve profitability and accelerate Asia-Pacific expansion. However, less than six months later, news emerged of a creditors' voluntary liquidation, and labor unions also stepped in to address unpaid wages, CPF contributions, and the cashing out of unused leave. Flash Coffee promised to retain the Hong Kong market, but its Luckin-copying, cash-burning approach became unsustainable when funding faltered. This article outlines the sequence of events and key details. [more…]

Recently, photos of Luckin Coffee appearing on the streets of Thailand have sparked heated discussions online. Has this national coffee brand, which successfully turned its fortunes around, really gone global? The company quickly gave a clear response: the Thailand store is purely a counterfeit. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident, including how the counterfeit store was discovered, Luckin's progress in defending its rights, and netizens' amusing reactions. It also explores Luckin's current overseas expansion plans. For those of you who love coffee, understanding brand developments and market phenomena is equally important. [more…]

A Guangdong chain beverage brand has reluctantly ended its five-year paperclip loyalty program after discovering that people were using custom paperclips of the same design bought online to redeem drinks in stores. What was meant as a physical giveaway to reward loyal customers was exploited through a loophole in the rules, leaving the merchant exclaiming, "We really didn't see that coming." Why did this loyalty program come to an end? And how have consumers reacted? This article will walk you through the whole story and explore the pros and cons of physical-giveaway loyalty programs as well as ways to improve them. [more…]

In the TV drama Ode to Joy, a conversation about "Green Mountain Coffee" and "Blue Mountain Coffee" led many viewers to believe that Green Mountain is a knockoff of Blue Mountain. In fact, there really is a coffee brand in the United States called Green Mountain, and it is completely different from Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee. Starting from this plot, this article first clarifies the real background of Green Mountain Coffee: it is a brand from Vermont, USA, which opened up the office market with Keurig single-serve coffee makers and K-Cups, taking a convenient and affordable route. Then it turns to Blue Mountain Coffee, explaining why it is expensive, what grade Blue Mountain No. 1 occupies within Jamaican Blue Mountain, and the flavor, pour-over parameters, and tasting method of Blue Mountain No. 1 recommended by Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, news about Luckin Coffee opening franchises has been circulating online, drawing attention from many consumers and entrepreneurs. However, Luckin officials quickly clarified: no form of franchise cooperation is currently open, and all so-called franchise and agency information is false. From counterfeit stores in Bangkok, Thailand to scam tactics using homophone accounts, the knockoff problem keeps emerging. This article will sort out the key points of Luckin's official statement, the history of the Little Deer Tea brand's merger, and insiders' interpretation of the franchise suspension, to help coffee lovers and potential investors distinguish truth from falsehood and avoid traps. [more…]

The Henan Provincial Market Supervision Administration recently published its 2024 No. 39 food safety notice, showing that of 1,040 batches of food across 21 major categories sampled, a total of 24 batches failed. Among them, a "Yangtze River North Bank" oolong tea-flavored beverage, nominally produced by Xunxian Fuxinyuan Beverage Factory, was blacklisted because its total bacterial count did not meet national standards. An investigation found that the manufacturer not only had a prior record of product sampling failures, but was also ruled by a court to have infringed upon Nongfu Spring's packaging through counterfeiting, and has now been listed as a dishonest judgment debtor. More notably, the outer packaging of this oolong tea is highly similar to Suntory oolong tea, and many consumers who mistakenly bought it on e-commerce platforms complained loudly after being duped. [more…]

The coffee market is in the thick of a 9.9 yuan price war, but Lucky Cup has taken a different tack by launching a 6.6 yuan promotion, drawing in plenty of thrifty consumers. However, some netizens in Zhengzhou have noticed that the signs of certain former Lucky Cup stores have actually changed to "Lucky Cup," yet the decor style and the poker king logo are completely identical to Lucky Cup's, making it hard to tell at a glance whether it's a rebranding or a counterfeit. Since Mixue Bingcheng's headquarters is in Zhengzhou and the official side has not responded, netizens are speculating that this may be a defensive move by the brand to prevent its registered trademark from being revoked due to three consecutive years of non-use. What exactly is the trademark strategy behind the name change? And how should consumers view it? [more…]

On February 14th of this year, the nation's first post office coffee shop opened its doors in Xiamen, and within just two days it made it onto Weibo's trending topics, drawing a great deal of attention. Along with the buzz came a flood of various "post office coffee franchise" information online. In response, China Post, Xiamen Post, and Post Coffee officially issued statements one after another, clearly stating that currently only self-operated stores have been opened and that a franchise model has never been offered. At the same time, the trademark applied for by Zhongyu Jiaye, the company cooperating with the postal service to open coffee shops, is also in an invalid status. This article will sort out the ins and outs of the incident to help coffee lovers distinguish truth from falsehood and avoid falling into fake franchise traps, and will also include professional coffee information channels such as Front Street Coffee. [more…]

On April 18, a new store called "blue bottle coffee" quietly appeared on a food delivery platform. After verification, this was not a counterfeit or a purchasing agent, but an official delivery channel opened by Blue Bottle Coffee. The delivery prices of drinks from Shanghai stores are consistent with those on the mini-program, and during the opening period, limited-edition fridge magnets were given away and delivery fee discounts were offered. Behind this move is a series of accelerated adjustments by Blue Bottle recently in store layout, pop-up events, and brand strategy. From rumors of store expansion in Shenzhen, Chengdu, and Xi'an, to the queues triggered by the Wuxi pop-up truck, and to blue bottle studio soon landing in Shanghai, this brand once jokingly called "unable to leave Shanghai" is trying to break its established rhythm. However, at a time when coffee consumers are increasingly picky and competition among chain brands is fierce, whether opening delivery can truly help Blue Bottle win more users' hearts still needs time to test. [more…]

Recently, a knockoff brand highly similar to Luckin Coffee has been appearing in multiple cities — Lucky Cat Coffee (LUCKY CAT COFFEE). The brand is extremely close to Luckin in visual design, store decoration, and even staff attire, sparking heated discussion among netizens. Lucky Cat Coffee has been springing up across the country since April this year, and many consumers mistakenly believed it was a rebranding or sub-brand of Luckin. Although Luckin has officially responded, discussions about whether Lucky Cat Coffee is legitimate and whether it can be franchised continue. This article will sort out the sequence of events and remind entrepreneurs to be cautious when choosing a franchise brand, so as to avoid losses caused by an unstable brand foundation. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

Recently, Chayan Yuese successfully sued Chayan Guanse, and this showdown between an authentic brand and a copycat brand has attracted widespread attention. As a local internet-famous milk tea brand in Changsha, Chayan Yuese has won many fans with its unique Chinese style and taste, while Chayan Guanse was sued for infringement for imitating its name and visual design. The court ultimately ruled that Chayan Guanse constituted unfair competition, requiring it to stop using the relevant logos and compensate for losses. So, is Chayan Yuese's milk tea actually good? This article will take you through the whole case and share the perspective of professional coffee lovers. At the same time, we will also focus on coffee culture and recommend Front Street Coffee's specialty coffee beans, providing more inspiration for your beverage choices. [more…]

In childhood memories, White Rabbit milk candy holds a special place, but now it is being maliciously exploited by some merchants and turned into the signboard of knockoff milk tea. Recently, Bright Dairy filed a lawsuit against two food companies and a seller for trademark infringement of "White Rabbit," and the court ruled in the first instance that the infringing parties must pay 250,000 yuan in compensation. This case not only exposed the true face of "internet-famous White Rabbit milk tea," but also once again aroused people's attention to counterfeit and shoddy products. This article will take you through the ins and outs of the incident and discuss how to distinguish genuine products from knockoffs and protect your own rights and interests. [more…]

In Starbucks' recently launched Berry Good Times collection, a mug that comes with a rabbit plush toy quickly went viral thanks to its adorable design, and it was even briefly out of stock on e-commerce platforms. However, consumers who received the first batch of products discovered that the actual plush toy looked vastly different from the official poster, and a flood of complaints and jokes soon appeared on social media. Some joked that this was the difference between a "996 work rabbit" and a "fresh graduate rabbit," while others said that quality control failures on Starbucks plush merchandise are nothing new. This discussion sparked by a single rabbit not only reflects fans' expectations for brand merchandise, but also reveals consumers' complicated attitude toward the gap between emotional value and product quality. [more…]